I'd ordered Mao: The Unknown Story based on my continuing interest in China and how it became the incredible menage of opportunity and tyranny it is today. Now Nicholas Kristof, whose excellent reporting, with his wife, Sheryl WuDunn, has been a constant source of insight, has given the book a review that, like China, is decidedly positive—in the sense that we need to be engaged with the country and its history—even as we are repelled by it.
I haven't read the book, yet, but this review deserves note.
Kristof calls the book "magisterial," but has a number of important comments to add in his review, 'Mao': The Real Mao - New York Times:
Another problem: Mao comes across as such a villain that he never really becomes three-dimensional. As readers, we recoil from him but don't really understand him. He is presented as such a bumbling psychopath that it's hard to comprehend how he bested all his rivals to lead China and emerge as one of the most worshipped figures of the last century.
Finally, there is Mao's place in history. I agree that Mao was a catastrophic ruler in many, many respects, and this book captures that side better than anything ever written. But Mao's legacy is not all bad. Land reform in China, like the land reform in Japan and Taiwan, helped lay the groundwork for prosperity today. The emancipation of women and end of child marriages moved China from one of the worst places in the world to be a girl to one where women have more equality than in, say, Japan or Korea. Indeed, Mao's entire assault on the old economic and social structure made it easier for China to emerge as the world's new economic dragon.
Perhaps the best comparison is with Qinshihuang, the first Qin emperor, who 2,200 years ago unified China, built much of the Great Wall, standardized weights and measures and created a common currency and legal system - but burned books and buried scholars alive. The Qin emperor was as savage and at times as insane as Mao - but his success in integrating and strengthening China laid the groundwork for the next dynasty, the Han, one of the golden eras of Chinese civilization. In the same way, I think, Mao's ruthlessness was a catastrophe at the time, brilliantly captured in this extraordinary book - and yet there's more to the story: Mao also helped lay the groundwork for the rebirth and rise of China after five centuries of slumber.
Mao bad is not the whole story. Mao good is not the story. But, if the Germans had won the Second World War in Europe and had become our main trading partner, what would we be saying about Hitler now? Authors Jung Chang and Jon Halliday clearly are of the opinion that no terrors are worth the progress made by China and I would generally agree. It is hard to say what, if anything, would be different about China (except its communism) economically and politically today if there had been no Mao. I suspect that, given the rise of other economies in the region, China could have climbed into modernism sooner and without the madness of the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution.
Technorati Tags: China, history, Mao, kristof
Recent Comments